Judging the Beautiful Game: Can soccer be made more interesting?

THERE ARE ample reasons why football is called “the beautiful game”.  It is played by the fittest and quickest people from all corners of the planet. 

Football, or soccer, is a stage for men and women with impossibly snappy reflexes, whirring in insect-like precision.  Football is bio-mechanical poetry, and it demonstrates the best the human body can achieve. 

What’s more, the football field is just the right size and space, just the right dimension for spectators.  We can sit close enough to see every strain and grimace, every dive and struggle.  A top-class soccer match can be a fishbowl of human drama.

But let us put it to a lounge room trial and judgement.  I want to mention two things, m’Lord.  The highest level has more than socially-permitable numbers of tossers.  And it can actually be boring: you hardly see any goals.

The Case against Football

We can’t do too much about the first thing.  Football has great potential to show off individual skill and brilliance, so it will attract the show boats.

It is a blokes’ catwalk, with teams stacked with the male equivalents of supermodels.  Watch them posturing and posing when goals are scored, or strutting in various degrees of undress when the final whistle blows.  Player avarice approaches the Naomi Campbell high water mark – only their agent could only tell you how much money they get before they arise from bed.

Yet we can do something about the second.  If you want to see how football can be improved, have a look at a similar game, a quieter one, albeit one where the players are armed with curve-topped clubs.

Hockey has been called soccer with sticks.  The field is just about the same, and it is played with eleven in a side.  It has a centre forward and a goal keeper.

Yet it doesn’t have the legions of followers.  The fit young players exercising their impossible reflexes for their country still need day jobs, perhaps working in a paint shop like John Travolta in Saturday Night Fever.

The Case for Hockey

Yet hockey is creating a new future for itself, for it has made a gut-swooping change to their rules.

Hockey has simply abandoned the off side rule.  

Yes, a goal can be scored by a forward who spends the game lurking around the goal post.

Forwards can roam all over the field, waiting for a ball like a seagull for a chip.  Full backs have to cover vast new areas of real estate, looking over their shoulders to see who is behind them.

This rule modification has changed the game, and for the better.

One: it has spread the game out along the length of the field.  The whole field of play now goes from back line to back line.

Previously, the action was compacted within the zone on the field between the two opposing full backs at the rear, just like football.  Any opposition player stepping outside the zone was off-side, and had effectively removed himself from the game.  

Two: the rule change makes the game more unpredictable.  If a player can get the ball up the other end, their team can suddenly score.  Goals against the flow of play become more common.

Three:  more goals can be scored.  Or more precisely, a goal can come at any time, from any set play or unexpected mistake.

A Trial of New Rules, Your Worship?

Can you imagine if soccer went the same way?  Can you imagine the increased excitement, the watchability of the game, if a player like Cristiano Ronaldo constantly roamed around the penalty box, pouncing on any ball lobbed up to him?

Gaps would open up as players marking their opposite numbers follow them to the more remote corners of the field.

Hockey hasn’t finished with picking over its rules and flinging away ones that slow down the game or make it boring.  The game of the curved stick is now experimenting with modifying more rules.

Legendary hockey coach and player Ric Charlesworth is one of a group of people who have developed some new possible rules.  They’ve tried out games with just nine a side, and made the goals a metre wider.  The penalty corner is modified so as so the attacking side is more likely to score.

And the Verdict

Still, even if a new magic formula is developed that makes hockey better viewing than Question Time in Parliament, I’m not predicting it will overtake football in popularity.

There is no case, m’Lord.  Football will always have more advantage.  It is easier to play, and kids can strike up a game anywhere in the world.  Hockey needs some expensive investment in specially-crafted sticks, and the best hockey is played on artificial turf.  

However, we don’t have to suffer an hour and a half of scoreless draws when we watch the best football matches in the world.  Changes can be made to make things ... happen.  Like goals.

And consider this:  if you have concerns about your son becoming a Maradona prima-donna, consider putting a curved stick in this hand.

Disclaimer: the author still plays hockey, and is the goalkeeper for the Buccaneers in the Sunshine Coast Masters hockey competition.

Follow Chris on Facebook, Twitter or Google+  

Blog Promotion Top Blogs


Blogs Blog Tools Allie Marie

From Woody Guthrie to the Arab Spring

It is one hundred years since the birth of Woody Guthrie, the dusty-voiced 1940’s Oklahoma folk balladeer who has held a strong fascination for a generation of American musicians.

There’s a new album released of songs based on his lyrics, curated once again by his daughter Nora, featuring artists he inspired such as Jackson Brown.

Yet Woody Guthrie has inspired many people who have never listened to his music, or probably anything vaguely folkish.  His greatest gift to lefties and try-hard rebels is the slogan he stuck on his acoustic guitar in the 1940’s – this machine kills fascists.

Woody Guthrie, photo Lester Balog, Woody Guthrie Archives

The audacity and confidence of this statement should send a chill up your spine, if your politics is anywhere to the left of Genghis Khan.  It should give you a surge of empowerment, a tingling sense that you can do something.

I thought the slogan would look great on my computer.  I could make it into a sticker for my laptop!  It would be a signal that words –my words - have power, that the keyboard is mightier than the sword. 

So I googled “this machine kills fascists sticker laptop”.  And there it is.  In fact, there is a range of laptop stickers featuring this slogan.  It looks like a whole cadre of geeky activists have got it covered.

Folks, you can buy the stickered slogan through Amazon.  Along with the tee shirt, skateboard, posters, hat, and bumper stickers.

The discovery that “this machine kills fascists” is now at the centre of a whole range of consumer products dampened my spirits.  It undercut the impact of the slogan.

And after some more silent pondering, I’ve decided the slogan may be somewhat presumptuous for a computer.

After all, not many are using Apple’s finest to battle dictators.

Computers don’t kill fascists, dictators, or authoritarian regimes.  Despite excitable claims, social media doesn’t threaten them.  In some places, ruthless leaders use it to preserve their own power.

Take the case of the Arab Spring, where the true impact of portable computing devices and social media do not fulfil the hype. 

Yes, social media helped accelerate the change of government in Tunisia and Egypt, but it has slowed it down in Syria, where Twitter and Google reportedly agreed to a Syrian government demand to enforce rules that censor tweets and blogs.

Large companies making money in the online world acquiesce with such states.  Vodaphone apparently agreed with a request by the former Egyptian regime to suspend their mobile phone network during the turmoil in Egypt.

Google initially tried to co-operate with the Chinese government, but Google broke free from that awkward embrace after the rest of the world criticised it for being co-opted into self-censorship.

Social networks in China track the IP addresses of their customers on behalf of the government.  Behind the “Great Firewall of China”, access to 2,600 websites is impossible.

So the message I have downloaded from my pondering is this: the laptop sticker looks cool, but don’t fool yourself.  This machine annoys fascists.

Or: this machine is used by fascists.  Used against you.

So what machines kills fascists?  Look at the sentiment behind the slogan. 

Woody Guthrie knew the message from music can inspire people to take up the fight against oppression.
 

Look at the photo again, and look at the direct and determined expression on Woody Guthrie’s face.  He knows his music has power to move people into action.

The guitar is just a tool to deliver the music, the computer is a tool to deliver the message.  It is human mind that does in fascists and dictators.  

So relent.  Get the sticker and the T shirt, and be inspired.

And most appropriately, get the hat.  Because what lies under the cap is truly the machine that kills fascists.

Sources.

http://socialcapital.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/twitter-facebook-and-youtubes-role-in-tunisia-uprising/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_Arab_Spring

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2011/07/springtime_for_twitter.html

http://travel.nytimes.com/2012/06/02/world/asia/google-to-alert-users-to-chinese-censorship.html

Follow Chris on Facebook, Twitter or Google+  

Blog Directory Top Blog Sites


Blogs Blog Tools Promote Blog

Robbed in my own house

Something was taken from house the other day, something I will truly miss.  I feel it as a mind numbing loss, and it seems I’m living at the scene of a burglary.

I lost the last month of work from my computer.  And it was a true criminal that stole it, one as real as a bloke who knocks in a window and steals my TV.  It was someone who designed and sent a vicious computer virus.

I’d never seen a virus like it before.  It attacked suddenly and without mercy.  Everything crashed and disappeared, replaced with a black screen.  And in the aftermath of the assault, the only message on my screen was an official looking one telling me I had to run a system restore program.

However, it said I only had a test version of the program.  Just click here, fill in your credit card number, the program will be uploaded and your computer will be fixed….

As I said, a criminal attack.  The computer had to be stripped back to its most basic factory settings to kill off the virus. 

In the hours I have spent reloading programs onto my computer, I have thought about all these consumer goods that I would not miss.  Take the juicer, one of our two coffee machines or two DVD players, just give me back my damn work.

It’s a prickly lesson that in world of expensive household toys, there are things without physical substance that are a lot more precious.  What I lost has no physical substance; it was digital information stored on something that is the size of my fingernail.

It is the products of the mind that are truly irreplaceable.

No.  There is something else that is honestly and truthfully irreplaceable.  These are the things that house fire victims always regret losing - the photos and videos of our families.  These things are the memories of the mind, made real.

I seethed, sulked and wailed over the loss of my work, but felt enormous relief that I had not lost the photos and videos of my first-born child.  Work I can do again.  I cannot record Guy at his first birthday party ever again, nor at his first Christmas.

I still have the digital photos and movies because I did a serious back up a month ago.  All the photos and videos of Guy were on the portable hard drive.

Once again, adversity and loss reveals what is really precious. 

Still, what I had lost was precious.  I laboured long and hard at it, and it was the product of many late nights of deep thinking. 

I lost all of the research I had done for my work, for my blogs.  Yet I can do both again.  I know where to find the research articles, and I can remember what I had written.

It will take me days to do it all again, so what was really stolen from me was time.  I was not robbed of the stuff that will feed the memories in years to come.

Follow Chris on Facebook, Twitter or Google+  

Blog Directory Top Blog Sites


Blogs Blog Tools Promote Blog

Member of the Board: Skateboarding in my ‘40’s

WHEN I turned forty, I was asked what I wanted for my birthday.  I said a skateboard.

My family laughed at me, and I got a rather fine set of framed prints.  But I was serious about the skateboard.

I knew just what I wanted, too.  A dignified long one, made for cruising, made for a bloke with slower reactions and a reconstructed knee.

A few months ago, I finally got one.  I was driving down the streets in my community and there it was, embedded in a pile of household debris.  Like a lost torpedo, beached and pointing to the sky.

In a flash I pulled over, and gently prised it out.  Apart from a busted wheel, it looked fine.  Perfect, even.  Fate, I decided.

By the end of the day, I had a new set of wheels on it, as well as knee pads and elbow braces from a sports store.

But that night, the skateboard sat motionless on the lounge room floor.  Black and bullet-like, hunched over pristine new wheels, it was the picture of restrained energy, impatient and perplexed at its immobile state.

It could not be helped: this forty-something man does not know how to ride a skateboard.

I downloaded instructions on how to ride a longboard skateboard, and I started looking for long, smooth pathways with a gentle slope.  But I did not, dare not, strap on the knee braces and step on the skateboard deck.

My wife wisely pointed out that it would not be a good look to have a mayoral candidate campaigning with a broken arm from a skateboarding incident.  There were enough questions about my judgement, without suffering an injury that would embarrass a teenager.

I deferred to her judgement.  After all, she has form on this.  She once broke her ankle trying to ride a skateboard.  She said it was her brothers’ fault, as they were egging her on.

Still, if a 22 year old girl could not do it without a bone-cracking injury, my chances are looking slim at 45.

And why do I want to skateboard?

Because I surf, and I know the sensation of standing on a board and flowing, just flowing, over a silvery surface.

Because I remember the 1970s, when skateboards first emerged in their swirling paisley plastic magnificence, the second coolest thing after a Sandman.

I visited my aunt in Sydney in the ‘70’s, and glory be, she lived on the top of a hill.  Down the street streamed the skateboarders on bullet-like boards, flared tight pants and long flowing hair.  Cool.

And they rode with such attitude.  Nonchalance and indifference, walking away with stiff-legged dignity whenever they clipped the gutter and rolled onto the road.

Maybe it is not nostalgia that draws me to do this.  Maybe it is because I am a grown man, and if I want to skateboard, I bloody well can.

So now I have decided to see if I can ride this skateboard.  I have updated my medical insurance and I shall report back in future blogs on injuries, triumphs, and what my wife says (probably “I told you”).

I have identified a benign sloping pathway not too far away.  

The skateboard has emerged from under the bookcase, looking resentful and dusty, but still sporting a barely contained malevolent energy.

It awaits.

Follow Chris on Facebook, Twitter or Google+ 

Souvenirs of a dead man

The cap of a dead Japanese soldier is kept in a box in a cupboard at my place.  It was given to me by my grandfather when I was quite small.

It was one of my WWII playthings I got from him, along with a fibreglass insert for an American helmet.

The cap is quite small, and I often wondered how a man could have possibly worn it.  Or was he a child like me?

There are words inked inside the cap.  I still wonder if it is the name of the soldier.

My grandfather drove jeeps for the Americans in New Guinea in WWII, and came back from the war with a range of souvenirs, besides the cap.

He told a story that he had a brace of Colt 45 pistols.  On the way into Newstead wharf, an officer told the returning soldiers to get rid of their contraband.  Dutifully my grandfather threw his pistols over the side of the ship.  To his dismay, he was never searched, and always bemoaned the loss of his pistols.

I think of those pistols at the bottom of the Brisbane River whenever I cross the Breakfast Creek bridge and look at the agitated brown river water.

For whatever reason, he kept the cap.  I have little doubt it came off a dead soldier.

When going through my father’s things in 2010, I found a bundle of small photos my grandfather took in New Guinea.  There are photos of a wrecked Japanese ship on a beach.

The writing on the back says “Kioto Maru/Japanese ship-grounded/1943”.  I now know the Kyoto Maru was already grounded when the Allies took Lae, but I always wondered if the cap came from a soldier who perished on that ship.

I have started to think I should see if it is a name inside the cap, and establish whether he perished in the Lae area.

I now fantasize that I find out who it belonged to, and I send it back to a tearful and grateful family.

But the reality is that there are souvenirs throughout Australia that won’t be going back to Japan.  A cap is not the worst souvenir Australian soldiers brought back.  In Australian museums, I have heard there are collections of Japanese bones.  

When fathers and grandfathers have died, and children have looked in those boxes buried deep in cupboards, they must have found these shocking souvenirs. 

Unsure what to do, they have donated them to museums, where they in turn are put in boxes at the back of cupboards.

War is brutal and gruesome, but the war in the Pacific was probably the conflict that most brutalised our soldiers.  Things happened in the jungle that were not passed down into our popular culture.

I was always fascinated by what my grandfather did, and I still am.  When I was a wide-eyed kid, I asked him if he killed anyone.  He gently said no, he had to keep both hands on the wheel of the jeep.

I believe him, and the paper of his war record backs him up.  His war was a mundane one of driving supplies.

But I still have the cap of a dead soldier in my cupboard.  I don’t know where it will be in the future, or if I will pass it onto my own son or grandson.

If I do keep it in the family, I will tell the truth of it.  Of nameless bones, of the needless Australian deaths at Tarakan and Balikpapan, and a rusting ship on a beach.

Follow Chris on Facebook, Twitter or Google+ 

Shields, steel and saddles: The modern sport of jousting explained.

 On 7 and 8 July, at the Abbey Medieval Festival, Caboolture will host an international tournament for one of most interesting of modern sports – jousting.

You may think jousting was a historic chivalric pursuit, but it thrives today as a modern contact sport.  

Picture this: hundreds of kilos of humans, horses and armour charging at each other, intent on landing the point of their 3 metre lance on the body of their opponent.

There will be wood flying, dents in armour, and if the crowd gets what they want, someone will be knocked off their horse.

No wonder it is popular.  In fact, so popular there is now an International Jousting League, with rankings, and there are annual prestigious jousting events that attract the best from around the world.

Sounds modern?  It’s the way the sport was organised in the 13^th century.  In medieval times, the best knights would travel from tournament to tournament, and were the “sports celebrities” of their day. 

Like all the best sports, the rules of jousting are simple and straightforward, but they allow a great deal of subtlety and gamesmanship from the competitors.

The object of jousting is for a knight to land their lance tip on their opponent - that scores points.   A hit is called an “ataint” and an ataint scores if it is a hit on the shield, body or helmet.  But you get even more points if you shatter your lance upon your opponent.  Yes, wince as you picture that.

The lances are designed to shatter on impact, and the tips are replaced after each ataint.  The breaking point is a set distance from the tip, and a lance must break at that point if it the ataint is to count.

And what does the  jousting “stadium” look like?  Like all sports, there are tiers of seatings all around, so the spectators can see every hit, hear every grunt, and all of the action.  Some things are eternal – it was the same for the gladiatorial games in Rome.

Like most equestrian sports, spectators are more worried about the horses than the humans. Fear not, the horses are safe.  Safer than the jousters. 

There have always been great protections built into jousting to protect the horses.  Harming or targeting  the horses is dreadfully taboo.  If a horse is hit, the offending knight loses the tournament and traditionally had to surrender his own horse.

In fact, we think the horses rather enjoy the action and attention.  Like the jousting knights, they don’t hold back.  And that is how all elite modern sports should be .

As a modern sport, jousting  may even be better than many of the ball-chasing events you see on pay TV.  

It is a brief, intense one-on-one  contest where you can’t miss the action.  All the drama is distilled down to a single moment, the moment of impact.   There is noise, there is shiny armour, there are the “oohs” and “aahs” from the crowd.

And sometimes, we see a knight knocked off his horse.

So take your kids to see an international sporting event in July. An event  with no drunken spectators, one where you get to see a result, and one where everyone learns something about the past.  Go to the jousting.

(Click here to read about the jousting at the Abbey Medieval Festival)

Soldiers, not Saints

ANZAC DAY has … evolved over the last dozen years, and started to swell in size and significance.  

When I was a kid, some WWI veterans still marched, and the most of the kids involved were the Scouts holding the unit signs at the head of the march.  Now there are no WW1 veterans, and there are legions of school kids within and around the march.

My local ANZAC Day has grown to over a thousand people.  When I first started as a councillor, it was a couple of hundred residents.

How did it evolve?  ANZAC Day was once an annual day for the returned soldiers who could never reconcile that they had survived, while worthy others were left on Gallipoli or in Flanders fields.

As the WW1 veterans slowly then suddenly disappeared, we elevated the day to also celebrate the values they exhibited – mateship, endurance, courage, good humour.

That is fitting, but it is now moving beyond that.  We are giving the day a national spiritual dimension.   Don Watson wrote a very perceptive article in the latest Monthly magazine about the growing deification of ANZAC Day.

He asked are we giving it a “religious sort of meaning?”  Then:

“  we appear to be in the presence of a default state religion.”

There’s a jolt of recognition from me.  He’s right.  For anyone of standing or ambition in communities 100 years ago, you could not miss church on Sunday.  The same unbreakable obligation now applies to missing local ANZAC Day commemorations.

Australians all: the ANZACs should always be remembered, but not worshipped. 

Don’t forget, most of the ANZACs were 19 or 20 year old boys overseas for the first time.  They were young men having the most memorable and intense experience of their lives.  

Ever heard about the Wasser riot in Cairo on Good Friday 1915?  That’s when the young Australian troops nearly wrecked the red light district of Cairo.  After months of seemingly pointless training in Egypt, tensions and frustrations boiled over.

Here’s what one historian wrote:

“… when the story spread that some soldiers had been stabbed in a brothel, a crowd of men gathered, threw prostitutes and standover men from several houses into an alley, piled beds … and everything else portable  … into the street, and set fire to them.  At least one building was incinerated, and the mud walls … of several others were pulled down.”

“British military police arrived on horseback and attempted to disperse the rioters by firing at them.  They wounded several soldiers, but in return were bombarded with rocks, beer bottles, lengths of fire hose, and abuse, and wisely withdrew.  A few men then took to looting nearby shops …”

Whew.  You won’t see that event in the list of ANZAC Centenary commemorations.  If you want to see that, I am informed that an Australian bus tour of Oktoberfest in Munich is the closest thing.

The historian who wrote this (not the Oktoberfest bit) was Bill Gammage, in a book called The Broken Years.  It is a great book all Australians should read.

The book recounts the experience of the men from World War 1, using their own words.  Gammage absorbed the diaries and letters of over a thousand soldiers, and let them speak for themselves.

You can find incidents of incredible bravery, genuinely funny accounts of larrikinism, and tales of desertion and ill-discipline in The Broken Years.  It gives a balanced account that fills in the less pleasing aspects you won’t hear from archbishops and politicians.

When reading The Broken Years, you see these were extraordinary men, but you wonder if it is the proper thing to sanctify these men.

Still, it is something we have been doing ever since Australian men were crowned with the slouched hat, as I found when I did my Honours thesis on Australia in WW1.  I found we assigned saintly virtues to soldiers as soon as they donned the khaki.   And we were surprised when they acted like, well, young men.

Picture this:  15,000 men encamped around Brisbane in the early days of the war.  A total of 60,000 encamped during the war at Enoggera, Chermside and Bowen Park during WW1.  You can guess what happened.

I discovered reports of a lot of drunken soldiers and “serious trouble” on Brisbane streets at night.  Between November 1915 and June 1918, there 1,360 charges of drunkenness laid against soldiers.  The Secretary of the YMCA would collect drunk soldiers who missed the last tram or train to Enoggera and drive them there.

There was a social panic that loose women were” camped” around Enoggera.  There were strident shrills that these immoral women would lead these men astray, or sap the martial virtues of these Queensland soldiers.

It builds the picture of hordes of fit young men in 1914 and 1915, imbued with the sense they were off on a big adventure.  

ANZAC Day should be important, and we should remember how it seemed our national character emerged when these same fit young men were under fire at Gallipoli.

But let us not raise these young men to be a fixture behind an altar.

Let us remember what the original ANZAC Days were like.  Streets were filled with returned servicemen, drinking and catching up with their mates.  It may not have been a family atmosphere on ANZAC Day in the 1920’s.

It was a day of grief, remembering, and coping.  It was rawer, without the hushed ceremonies of set format and phrases we have today.

Bill Gammage best expresses what drove the original ANZAC Days.  He wrote that “[t]he living would never forget the dead, for war and men had bound men closely, till their united brotherhood contained everything worthwhile.”  ANZAC Day was their day, not ours.

And now ANZAC Day should belong to us, not cardinals and Cabinet members.  After all, the WW1 Diggers were ordinary Australian men, probably not different to the young Australian men who walk the streets today in hoodies and caps.

Like young Australian men today, they cannot be denied a good time.  And like young Australians today, they would show exceptional qualities when placed under almost unimaginable duress. 

They were ordinary Australian men who had the chance to shine in an extraordinary time.

The Whiting Report Returns ... Every Friday 

THE PHONE stopped ringing at 7.30pm on the night I lost the election, as soon as it was clear I was not going to be the next Mayor.  And the harsh jangling of the ring tone has hardly been heard since. 

Now the phone rings a couple of times a day, when friends or family call.  Instead of fearing it and it problems it may bring, I welcome the chirpy ring tone.

How are you feeling, people asked in lowered tones.  Fine, I say, and it is true.  I have a feeling of strange contentment and detachment as I leave the tide of politics and current affairs to wash around me.

Let those who push that tide fret about the swirling minutiae of politics: I now give my focus to my family.

But as an ex-pollie, I don’t have to be silent.  I still have a lot to say.  I can still speak out when I see what needs to be said or done.  If fact, I can’t stop it.

It was the desire to speak up, to make a change that propelled me into running for local government 12 years ago.  And what kept me running was the desire to make a difference, not the desire to hold onto a well-paid job.    I never feared losing: my fear was that would be politically ineffectual, a political ornament.

I now hold no office, but I still have my voice, heard through this keyboard.

And I will keep speaking out, keeping up a dialogue.  I hope it will make a difference.  Maybe it will make you think, or nudge you to take some action.

You will be able to hear my thoughts on my weekly blog, sent every Friday.  That is my commitment to you.  I already have a swelling list of topics to discuss.

If you have any thoughts or any suggestions, I’d love to hear them.  And if you think I’m wrong, feel free to tell me, too.  You can email me at chris@chriswhiting.com.au or even call me.  As I said, I like to hear the jingle of the phone these days.

Next week, I look at the cultural monolith of the ANZAC legend.

19 March - Council Live! On Line!

WHEN you are watching the Australian Open tennis or an Australian Test Match, you can regard it as entertainment.   For the sportsmen and women on the screen, they can regard it as work.

And they are not the only wages earners slugging it out on your screen .  You can watch other people at work as well.  Your political representatives.

Our televisions are full of State and Federal politicians hard at their jobs, arguing in Parliament or opening stuff in hard hats and vests.  You can now see live Parliamentary debates on line.

Yet we can’t go on line and see the most accessible level of government at work.  Why can’t we see council meetings on line?

So that’s what I propose to do.

In my “Council Meetings Live On-Line” plan, broadcasts of council meetings will be on the council website.  Recordings of the meetings will also be stored on the council website.

You can watch your councillors at work anywhere, any time.  If there is an agenda item that interests you, you don’t have to take the day off work to come into council chambers to see what happens.

This is not rocket science.  If it was the equivalent of going to the moon, we would find there is a bunch of councils already set up camp on the lunar surface.

The State government thinks something similar.  In fact, they want all Queensland local councils to get on and do it by July 1.

On line broadcasts are done by councils all over the world, including the Gold Coast.  They know this is the 21st century and the on-line world offers a much better way for Council to do business.  There is no reason it shouldn’t happen here.

The real advantage is that it keeps Moreton Bay Regional Council more open and accountable.  It opens Council up to the people, and puts councillors under scrutiny.

 Scrutiny is good for us, both politicians and elite sportsmen.  At least that is something I will share with these well-tuned athletes.

Yup, I will never play for Australia.  But I can say that we both work better when the eye of the camera is broadcasting our efforts to your computer or living room.

23 February - How to turn a “supersize” council into a local council

The key word in the title “Moreton Bay Regional Council” is the word “regional”.  There is not much that is local about our local government anymore.

Despite amalgamation, the original challenge of any local government is more acute than ever:  how do we provide local services, at a local scale by local officers who know the area?

Here is my answer.  I will restructure council to deliver a better service to residents and rate payers.  This new council structure will be based around the three districts, with a full range of “customer services” being provided at each district.

Local work teams and local staff will return to local council offices at Caboolture, Redcliffe and Pine Rivers.  “Grass roots” council services will be delivered by local council officers and crews who know their local community.

If we cannot have de-amalgamation, this is the next best thing.  It aims to return the level of council services to where they were before amalgamation.  The aim is to have council officers based in local communities, officers who maintain local roads, parks, drains and sports clubs.

There is another aspect to a restructure that can help deliver better local services.  We need to return to a flatter structure with less hierarchy so local teams can make quick, common-sense decisions on servicing residents’ requests.

The third aspect for a restructure is to do it once, and do it properly.  The worst way to do it, is to do it over and over again.  Unfortunately, that has what happened at Moreton Bay with a total of 34 restructures in this term.  For staff to do their job and deliver council services, they need a settled structure that allows them to do their job.

Doing it once leads me to the next point.  Residents are asking how much will this cost?  The answer is very little – it is the internal movement of staff that is the point, not a refitting of everyone’s office.  My plan is certainly cheaper than the current practice of moving people around, time and time again.

It may be we are stuck with a regional government.  But that is no reason why we can’t return to delivering local services